Thursday, 20 March 2014

CLIPPERS: where are we now?


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cei.12204/abstract
A new article has been published which attempts a comprehensive review of CLIPPERS as it stands in 2013/2014. It is written for medics, but I thought gave a really good general summary of the condition, the research studies, the diagnosis, the treatments and the "still to do". I think it should prove particularly useful for doctors new to the condition. As far as I can tell it is freely available by following the above link, but if that doesn't work for any reason, you could try emailing Dr Dudesek and asking for a "preprint".

Read other articles in this series at Living With CLIPPERS.

Creative Commons Licence

Friday, 7 March 2014


One of the more interesting aspects of research is when scientists have discussions in public via the letters pages of scientific journals. One such letter has appeared in response to a short paper which I discussed briefly last year. Essentially, in the original paper, the authors examined a CLIPPERS patient using some different types of MR image acquired on a modern scanner with a stronger magnetic field than in some previous studies ("3T").

In this letter ("CLIPPERS and its related disorders, relevance of brain 3.0 T MR"), Dr Taieb and his colleagues suggest that although some of the observed differences seen could be due to the stronger magnetic field and different types of images, they may still not be sufficient to distinguish CLIPPERS from two competing conditions (primary angitis of the CNS and B-cell CNS Lymphoma). They very sensibly suggest that more work needs to be done to confirm the original observations in more patients. Also they stress the need to compare the appearance of the MR images directly with that of tissue samples, so that a detailed understanding of how the tissue is affecting the MRI can be obtained.

Read other articles in this series at Living With CLIPPERS.

Creative Commons Licence

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Rare Disease Day is Nearly Here

Friday 28th February 2014
A disease or disorder is defined as rare in Europe when it affects fewer than 1 in 2000. A disease or disorder is defined as rare in the USA when it affects fewer than 200,000 Americans at any given time. So CLIPPERS is definitely rare on both counts and probably rare even for an officially rare disease. The hope is that by considering the relationships between rare conditions and more common ones, greater progress can be made in diagnosis, treatment and patient care.
 
 

Read other articles in this series at Living With CLIPPERS.

Creative Commons Licence
Living With CLIPPERS by Bill Crum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Tuesday, 11 February 2014

A Spanish Case of CLIPPERS

A recent fatal BSOD encountered in my day-job.
I've been holding off discussing this case (CLIPPERS syndrome with atypical distribution of lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain) in the hope I could get hold of the full text - unfortunately I couldn't. Anyhow, these single cases, while interesting, are not always that insightful as these days they have to be atypical (or at least notably different in some way from "classic" CLIPPERS)  to be published. 

What I mean is that, they may be interesting to the specialist, but by throwing in an unusual presentation of symptoms or comorbidities, they can "muddy the waters" (in my view at least) as to what CLIPPERS really is. On the other hand, you could argue that I don't know what I'm talking about (and you'd be right!) and that CLIPPERS could be a broad-spectrum disorder that is still being mapped out by these case studies.

I only got to read the summary of this paper, but the gist seems to be that a 40 year old woman presented with some of the better-known CLIPPERS symptoms (diplopia, ataxia, disarthria) but a non-standard appearance of brain lesions in MRI. The lesions seemed to be in the standard places but more evenly distributed (?) (with the proviso that I'm not 100% certain what "enhancement gradient" means in this context); the authors imply the lesion density remains more constant in different parts of the brain than is typical. The response to treatment with steroids seems to be as expected for CLIPPERS.

So at least there are still papers coming through and things to be learned about CLIPPERS.

Read other articles in this series at Living With CLIPPERS.

Creative Commons Licence